How to review an AI draft before publishing
A fluent AI draft is not evidence. Review the facts first, the interpretation second and the style last. This order helps you avoid spending time polishing a claim that should be removed.
Trace facts to the source
Highlight names, dates, statistics, quotations and cause-and-effect statements. For each one, locate the supporting source passage. If it cannot be supported, remove it or explicitly mark uncertainty. Do not substitute a confident AI explanation for missing evidence.
Test what shortening changed
Compare 'some customers reported' with 'customers achieved', or 'we plan to' with 'we launched'. Shortening can quietly change an observation into a result. Preserve the sample, time period and scope when they matter to the claim.
Make the voice yours
Replace generic hooks and exaggerated urgency with a precise statement. Review brand terms and reader assumptions. Manual changes do not cost credits in PostReady. Selected-text AI revision can help with a passage, but its replacement still needs the same fact check.
Finish in the destination platform
Check mentions, links, line breaks, accessibility and the complete thread order after copying. Preview checks and text comparison can flag issues, but do not certify truth or predict distribution.
- Source supports every claim.
- Quotes and numbers match.
- Permission and private information checked.
- Tone and audience appropriate.
- Destination formatting inspected.
Editorial example · not a customer result
Source
Source: Four interviewees said the revised menu was easier to find. The test did not measure task completion time.
Illustrative draft / review
Supported: Four interviewees found the revised menu easier to locate. Unsupported: The new menu makes every user twice as fast. Why: The source measured neither all users nor completion time.
Download the EN/TR review checklist
AI drafts require human review. Direct publishing and scheduling are not currently available.